<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Globalization and Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Globalization and Health</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/14" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/23">
        <title>Influence of health rights discourses and community organizing on equitable access to health: the case of HIV, tuberculosis and cancer in Peru</title>
        <description>Background:
The right to health is recognized as a fundamental human right. Social participation is implied in the fulfillment of health rights since Alma Ata posited its relevance for successful health programs, although a wide range of interpretations has been observed for this term. While Peruvian law recognizes community and social participation in health, it was the GFATM requirement of mixed public-civil society participation in Country Coordination Mechanisms (CCM) for proposal submission what effectively led to formal community involvement in the national response to HIV and, to a lesser extent, tuberculosis. This has not been the case, however, for other chronic diseases in Peru. This study aims to describe and compare the role of health rights discourse and community involvement in the national response to HIV, tuberculosis and cancer.
Methods:
Key health policy documents were identified and analyzed. In-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders, representatives of civil society organizations (CSO), and leaders of organizations of people affected by HIV, cancer and tuberculosis.Results and discussionA health rights discourse, well established in the HIV field, is expanding to general health discussions and to the tuberculosis (TB) field in particular. Both HIV and TB programs have National Multisectoral Strategic Plans and recognize participation of affected communities&apos; organizations. Similar mechanisms are non-existent for cancer or other disease-focused programs, although other affected patients are starting some organization efforts. Interviewees agreed that reaching the achievements of HIV mobilization is difficult for other diseases, since the HIV response was modeled based on a global movement with strong networks and advocacy mechanisms, eventually succeeding in the establishment of financial sources like the GFATM. Nevertheless, organizations linked to cancer and other diseases are building a National Patient Network to defend health rights.
Conclusions:
There are new efforts to promote and protect health rights in Peru, probably inspired by the achievements of organizations of people living with HIV (PLHA). The public health sector must consolidate the participation of affected communities&apos; organizations in decision-making processes and implementation of health programs. PLHA organizations have become a key political and social actor in Peruvian public health policy.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Clara Figueroa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Cáceres</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/22">
        <title>Social and economic determinants of unequal HIV care access among people living with HIV in Peru</title>
        <description>Background:
Equity in access to health care among people living with HIV (PLHA) has not been extensively studied in Peru despite the fact there is significant social diversity within this group. We aimed to assess the extent to which health care provision to PLHA, including ARVT, was equitable and, if appropriate, identify factors associated with lower access.
Methods:
We conducted a survey among adult PLHA in four cities in Peru, recruited through respondent-driven sampling (RDS), to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics, social network size, household welfare, economic activity, use of HIV-related services including ARV treatment, and health-related out-of-pocket expenses.
Results:
Between September 2008 and January 2009, 863 individuals from PLHA organizations in four cities of Peru were enrolled. Median age was 35 (IQR = 29--41), and mostly male (62%). Overall, 25% reported to be gay, 11% bisexual and 3% transgender. Most PLHA (96%) reported access to some kind of HIV-related health service, and 84% were receiving those services at a public facility. Approximately 85% of those reporting access to care were receiving antiretroviral treatment (ARV), and 17% of those not in treatment already had indication to start treatment. Among those currently on ARV, 36% percent reported out-of-pocket expenses within the last month. Transgender identity and age younger than 35 years old, were associated with lower access to health care.
Conclusions:
Our findings contribute to a better social and demographic characterization of the situation of PLHAs, their access to HIV care and their source of care, and provide an assessment of equity in access. In the long term, it is expected that HIV care access, as well as its social determinants, will impact on the morbidity and mortality rates among those affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. HIV care providers and program managers should further characterize the barriers to healthcare access and develop strategies to resolve them by means of policy change, for the benefit of the health service users and as part of the national response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic within a human rights framework.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Alfonso Silva-Santisteban</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eddy Segura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clara Sandoval</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maziel Girón</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margarita Petrera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Caceres</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/21">
        <title>Screening for diabetes and hypertension in a rural low income setting in western Kenya utilizing home-based and community-based strategies</title>
        <description>Background:
The burdens of hypertension and diabetes are increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is important to identify patients with these conditions early in the disease process. The goal of this study, therefore, is to compare community- versus home-based screening for hypertension and diabetes in Kenya.
Methods:
This was a feasibility study conducted by the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) program in Webuye, a town in western Kenya. Home-based (door-to-door) screening occurred in March 2010 and community-based screening in November 2011. HIV counselors were trained to screen for diabetes and hypertension in the home-based screening with local district hospital based staff conducting the community-based screening. Participants &gt;18 years old qualified for screening in both groups. Counselors referred all participants with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) &#8805;160&#8201;mmHg and/or a random blood glucose &#8805;7&#8201;mmol/L (126&#8201;mg/dL) to a local clinic for follow-up. Differences in likelihood of screening positive between the two strategies were compared using Fischer&#8217;s Exact Test. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with the likelihood of following-up after a positive screening.
Results:
There were 236 participants in home-based screening: 13 (6%) had a SBP &#8805;160&#8201;mmHg, and 54 (23%) had a random glucose &#8805; 7&#8201;mmol/L. There were 346 participants in community-based screening: 35 (10%) had a SBP &#8805;160&#8201;mmHg, and 27 (8%) had a random glucose &#8805; 7&#8201;mmol/L. Participants in community-based screening were twice as likely to screen positive for hypertension compared to home-based screening (OR=1.93, P=0.06). In contrast, participants were 3.5 times more likely to screen positive for a random blood glucose &#8805;7&#8201;mmol/L with home-based screening (OR=3.51, P&lt;0.01). Rates for following-up at the clinic after a positive screen were low for both groups with 31% of patients with an elevated SBP returning for confirmation in both the community-based and home-based group (P=1.0). Follow-up after a random glucose was also low with 23% returning in the home-based group and 22% in the community-based group (P=1.0).
Conclusion:
Community- or home-based screening for diabetes and hypertension in LMICs is feasible. Due to low rates of follow-up, screening efforts in rural settings should focus on linking cases to care.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Sonak Pastakia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shamim Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jemima Kamano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Constantine Akwanalo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Samson Ndege</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Buckwalter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rajesh Vedanthan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerald Bloomfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/20">
        <title>Ownership and use of mobile phones among health workers, caregivers of sick children and adult patients in Kenya: cross-sectional national survey</title>
        <description>Background:
The rapid growth in mobile phone penetration and use of Short Message Service (SMS) has been seen as a potential solution to improve medical and public health practice in Africa. Several studies have shown effectiveness of SMS interventions to improve health workers&apos; practices, patients&apos; adherence to medications and availability of health facility commodities. To inform policy makers about the feasibility of facility-based SMS interventions, the coverage data on mobile phone ownership and SMS use among health workers and patients are needed.
Methods:
In 2012, a national, cross-sectional, cluster sample survey was undertaken at 172 public health facilities in Kenya. Outpatient health workers and caregivers of sick children and adult patients were interviewed. The main outcomes were personal ownership of mobile phones and use of SMS among phone owners. The predictors analysis examined factors influencing phone ownership and SMS use.
Results:
The analysis included 219 health workers and 1,177 patients&apos; respondents (767 caregivers and 410 adult patients). All health workers possessed personal mobile phones and 98.6% used SMS. Among patients&apos; respondents, 61.2% owned phones and 71.4% of phone owners used SMS. The phone ownership and SMS use was similar between caregivers of sick children and adult patients. The respondents who were male, more educated, literate and living in urban area were significantly more likely to own the phone and use SMS. The youngest respondents were less likely to own phones, however when the phones were owned, younger age groups were more likely to use SMS. Respondents living in wealthier areas were more likely to own phones; however when phones are owned no significant association between the poverty and SMS use was observed.
Conclusions:
Mobile phone ownership and SMS use is ubiquitous among Kenyan health workers in the public sector. Among patients they serve the coverage in phone ownership and SMS use is lower and disparities exist with respect to gender, age, education, literacy, urbanization and poverty. Some of the disparities on SMS use can be addressed through the modalities of mHealth interventions and enhanced implementation processes while further growth in mobile phone penetration is needed to reduce the ownership gap.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Dejan Zurovac</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gabriel Otieno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Samuel Kigen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Agneta Mbithi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alex Muturi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Snow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Nyandigisi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/19">
        <title>Global health experiences of U.S. Physicians: a mixed methods survey of clinician-researchers and health policy leaders</title>
        <description>Background:
Interest and participation in global health activities among U.S. medical trainees has increased sharply in recent decades, yet the global health activities of physicians who have completed residency training remain understudied. Our objectives were to assess associations between individual characteristics and patterns of post-residency global health activities across the domains of health policy, education, and research.
Methods:
Cross-sectional, mixed methods national survey of 521 physicians with formal training in clinical and health services research and policy leadership. Main measures were post-residency global health activity and characteristics of this activity (location, funding, products, and perceived synergy with domestic activities).
Results:
Most respondents (73%) hold faculty appointments across 84 U.S. medical schools and a strong plurality (46%) are trained in internal medicine. Nearly half of all respondents (44%) reported some global health activity after residency; however, the majority of this group (73%) reported spending &#8804;10% of professional time on global health in the past year. Among those active in global health, the majority (78%) reported receiving some funding for their global health activities, and most (83%) reported at least one scholarly, educational, or other product resulting from this work. Many respondents perceived synergies between domestic and global health activities, with 85% agreeing with the statement that their global health activities had enhanced the quality of their domestic work and increased their level of involvement with vulnerable populations, health policy advocacy, or research on the social determinants of health. Despite these perceived synergies, qualitative data from in-depth interviews revealed personal and institutional barriers to sustained global health involvement, including work-family balance and a lack of specific avenues for career development in global health.
Conclusions:
Post-residency global health activity is common in this diverse, multi-specialty group of physicians. Although those with global health experience describe synergies with their domestic work, the lack of established career development pathways may limit the benefits of this synergy for individuals and their institutions.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>S Greysen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adam Richards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sidney Coupet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mayur Desai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aasim Padela</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/18">
        <title>Emergence of multilateral proto-institutions in global health and new approaches to governance: analysis using path dependency and institutional theory</title>
        <description>The role of multilateral donor agencies in global health is a new area of research, with limited research on how these agencies differ in terms of their governance arrangements, especially in relation to transparency, inclusiveness, accountability, and responsiveness to civil society. We argue that historical analysis of the origins of these agencies and their coalition formation processes can help to explain these differences. We propose an analytical approach that links the theoretical literature discussing institutional origins to path dependency and institutional theory relating to proto institutions in order to illustrate the differences in coalition formation processes that shape governance within four multilateral agencies involved in global health. We find that two new multilateral donor agencies that were created by a diverse coalition of state and non-state actors, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and GAVI, what we call proto-institutions, were more adaptive in strengthening their governance processes. This contrasts with two well-established multilateral donor agencies, such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, what we call Bretton Woods (BW) institutions, which were created by nation states alone; and hence, have different origins and consequently different path dependent processes.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>EduardoJ Gómez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rifat Atun</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/17">
        <title>Costs, outcomes and challenges for diabetes care in Spain</title>
        <description>Background:
Diabetes is becoming of increasing concern in Spain due to rising incidence and prevalence, although little information is known with regards to costs and outcomes. The information on cost of diabetes in Spain is fragmented and outdated. Our objective is to update diabetes costs, and to identify outcomes and quality of care of diabetes in Spain.
Methods:
We performed systematic searches from secondary sources, including scientific literature and government data and reports.
Results:
Diabetes Type II prevalence is estimated at 7.8%, and an additional 6% of the population is estimated to be undiagnosed. Four Spanish diabetes cost studies were analyzed to create a projection of direct costs in the NHS and productivity losses, estimating &#8364;5.1 billion for direct costs along with &#8364;1.5 billion for diabetes-related complications (2009) and labour productivity losses represented &#8364;2.8 billion. Glycemic control (glycolysated hemoglobin) is considered acceptable in 59% of adult Type II cases, in addition to 85% with HDL cholesterol &#8805;40mg/dl and 65% with blood pressure &lt;140/90 mmHg, pointing to good intermediate outcomes. However, annual figures indicate that over half of the Type II diabetics are obese (BMI &gt;30), 15% have diabetic retinopathy, 16% with microalbuminuria, and 15% with cardiovascular disease.
Conclusions:
The direct health care costs (8% of the total National Health System expenditure) and the loss of labour productivity are high. The importance of a multi-sectoral approach in prevention and improvements in management of diabetes are discussed, along with policy considerations to help modify the disease course.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Julio Lopez-Bastida</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mauro Boronat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juan Moreno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Willemien Schurer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/16">
        <title>Management of diabetes and diabetes policies in Turkey</title>
        <description>Background:
Diabetes and its complications are among the present and future challenges of the Turkish health care system. The objective of this paper is to discuss the current situation of diabetes and its management in Turkey with special emphasis on the changing policy environment.
Methods:
A literature review in databases such as PUBMED was performed from 2000 to 2011. This synthesis was complemented by grey literature, personal communication and contact with national and provincial health authorities and experts in diabetes from Turkey.
Results:
The literature review and expert consultations indicated a growing policy emphasis on diabetes. Both the public and private sectors, non-governmental organizations have initiated policy papers to shape the outlook of diabetes care in the future. This is in line with the current dynamics of the healthcare system.
Conclusions:
Diabetes care will be high on the agenda in future. Evidence based policy-making is the key to implement the policies adopted so far and a supportive environment is needed.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Mehtap Tatar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/15">
        <title>&amp;#8216;BRICS without straw&amp;#8217;? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies&amp;#8217; influence in global health</title>
        <description>Background:
Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as &#8216;BRICS&#8217; (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature?
Methods:
We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature.
Results:
Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS&#8217; collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries&#8217; material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily &#8216;opportunity seekers&#8217; and region mobilisers but with potential to become &#8216;issue leaders&#8217; and region organisers.
Conclusion:
Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be &#8216;early days&#8217; for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Harmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yina Xiao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eduardo Missoni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabrizio Tediosi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/14">
        <title>Is the reporting timeliness gap for avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks in global health surveillance systems associated with country transparency?</title>
        <description>Background:
This study aims to evaluate the length of time elapsed between reports of the same incidents related to avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks published by the WHO and ProMED-mail, the two major global health surveillance systems, before and after the amendment of the International Health Regulations in 2005 (IHR 2005) and to explore the association between country transparency and this timeliness gap.
Methods:
We recorded the initial release dates of each report related to avian flu or H1N1 listed on the WHO Disease Outbreak News site and the matching outbreak report from ProMED-mail, a non-governmental program for monitoring emerging diseases, from 2003 to the end of June 2009. The timeliness gap was calculated as the difference in days between the report release dates of the matching outbreaks in the WHO and ProMED-mail systems. Civil liberties scores were collected as indicators of the transparency of each country. The Human Development Index and data indicating the density of physicians and nurses were collected to reflect countries&#8217; development and health workforce statuses. Then, logistic regression was performed to determine the correlation between the timeliness gap and civil liberties, human development, and health workforce status, controlling for year.
Results:
The reporting timeliness gap for avian flu and H1N1 outbreaks significantly decreased after 2003. On average, reports were posted 4.09 (SD&#8201;=&#8201;7.99) days earlier by ProMED-mail than by the WHO. Countries with partly free (OR&#8201;=&#8201;5.77) and free civil liberties scores (OR&#8201;=&#8201;10.57) had significantly higher likelihoods of longer timeliness gaps than non-free countries. Similarly, countries with very high human development status had significantly higher likelihoods of longer timeliness gaps than countries with middle or low human development status (OR&#8201;=&#8201;5.30). However, no association between the timeliness gap and health workforce density was found.
Conclusion:
The study found that the adoption of IHR 2005, which contributed to countries&#8217; awareness of the importance of timely reporting, had a significant impact in improving the reporting timeliness gap. In addition, the greater the civil liberties in a country (e.g., importance of freedom of the media), the longer the timeliness gap.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/9/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Feng-Jen Tsai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eva Tseng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chang-Chuan Chan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiko Tamashiro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandrine Motamed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>André Rougemont</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2013, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-14</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1744-8603-9-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
