<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Globalization and Health - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Globalization and Health (ISSN 1744-8603) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/10"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/7">
            
            <title>Global affordability of fluoride toothpaste</title>
			<description>ObjectiveDental caries remains the most common disease worldwide and the use of fluoride toothpaste is a most effective preventive public health measure to prevent it. Changes in diets following globalization contribute to the development of dental caries in emerging economies. The aim of this paper is to compare the cost and relative affordability of fluoride toothpaste in high-, middle- and low-income countries. The hypothesis is that fluoride toothpaste is not equally affordable in high-, middle- and low-income countries.
Methods:
Data on consumer prices of fluoride toothpastes were obtained from a self-completion questionnaire from 48 countries. The cost of fluoride toothpaste in high-, middle- and low-income countries was compared and related to annual household expenditure as well as to days of work needed to purchase the average annual usage of toothpaste per head.
Results:
The general trend seems to be that the proportion of household expenditure required to purchase the annual dosage of toothpaste increases as the country's per capita household expenditure decreases. While in the UK for the poorest 30% of the population only 0.037 days of household expenditure is needed to purchase the annual average dosage (182.5 g) of the lowest cost toothpaste, 10.75 days are needed in Kenya. The proportion of annual household expenditure ranged from 0.02% in the UK to 4% in Zambia to buy the annual average amount of lowest cost toothpaste per head.
Conclusion:
Significant inequalities in the affordability of this essential preventive care product indicate the necessity for action to make it more affordable. Various measures to improve affordability based on experiences from essential pharmaceuticals are proposed.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/7</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Ann S Goldman, Robert Yee, Christopher J Holmgren and Habib Benzian</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:7</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/6">
            
            <title>The 'diagonal' approach to Global Fund financing: a cure for the broader malaise of health systems?</title>
			<description>Background:
The potentially destructive polarisation between 'vertical' financing (aiming for disease-specific results) and 'horizontal' financing (aiming for improved health systems) of health services in developing countries has found its way to the pages of Foreign Affairs and the Financial Times. The opportunity offered by 'diagonal' financing (aiming for disease-specific results through improved health systems) seems to be obscured in this polarisation.In April 2007, the board of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria agreed to consider comprehensive country health programmes for financing. The new International Health Partnership Plus, launched in September 2007, will help low-income countries to develop such programmes. The combination could lead the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to a much broader financing scope.DiscussionThis evolution might be critical for the future of AIDS treatment in low-income countries, yet it is proposed at a time when the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is starved for resources. It might be unable to meet the needs of much broader and more expensive proposals. Furthermore, it might lose some of its exceptional features in the process: its aim for international sustainability, rather than in-country sustainability, and its capacity to circumvent spending restrictions imposed by the International Monetary Fund.SummaryThe authors believe that a transformation of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria into a Global Health Fund is feasible, but only if accompanied by a substantial increase of donor commitments to the Global Fund. The transformation of the Global Fund into a 'diagonal' and ultimately perhaps 'horizontal' financing approach should happen gradually and carefully, and be accompanied by measures to safeguard its exceptional features.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Gorik Ooms, Wim Van Damme, Brook K Baker, Paul Zeitz and Ted Schrecker</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/5">
            
            <title>Dangerous medicines: Unproven AIDS cures and counterfeit antiretroviral drugs</title>
			<description>Background:
Increasing access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a critical goal endorsed by the United Nations and all of its member states. At the same time, anecdotal accounts suggest that the promotion of unproven AIDS 'cures' and remedies are widespread, and in the case of The Gambia, Iran and South Africa, have been promoted by governments directly. Although a range of legislative and regulatory measures have been adopted by some governments, and technical assistance has been provided by international agencies to address counterfeit medicines generally, the threat of counterfeit antiretroviral drugs is not being addressed.DiscussionCountries, charged with fulfilling the right to health and committed to expanding access to ART must explicitly recognize their obligation to combat unproven AIDS treatments and ensure the availability of a safe and efficacious drugs supply. International donors must help support and coordinate these efforts.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Joseph J Amon</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-27</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/4">
            
            <title>Convergence of obesity and high glycemic diet on compounding diabetes and cardiovascular risks in modernizing China: An emerging public health dilemma</title>
			<description>As China is undergoing dramatic development, it is also experiencing major societal changes, including an emerging obesity epidemic, with the prevalence of overweight and obesity doubling in the past decade. However, the implications of a high glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) traditional Chinese diet are adversely changing in modern times, as a high-glycemic diet is becoming a greater contributor to diabetes and cardiovascular risks in a population with rising obesity and decreasing physical activity. Specifically, a high GI diet adversely impacts metabolism and appetite control regulation, and notably confers substantially greater risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers among overweight and obese individuals (P&lt;0.05 for all); leading to an emerging vicious cycle of compounding adverse health risks. Notably, while no elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes were observed with higher GL intake among normal weight individuals, among overweight individuals, higher GL was strongly associated with higher risk of coronary heart disease (RR=2.00, 95%CI: 1.31-2.96), stroke (RR=2.13, 1.28-3.53), and type 2 diabetes (RR=1.52, 1.22-1.89 among Chinese). Additionally, the influx of Western-diets rich in saturated fats and high-glycemic sugar-sweetened beverages also threaten the health of the population. This review highlights the emerging adverse convergence of a high-glycemic Asian diet with a Chinese society experiencing an emerging obesity epidemic, and the important implications of these combined factors on compounding cardiometabolic risks. Potential policy directions in China are also discussed.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/4</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Eric L Ding and Vasanti S Malik</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:4</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/3">
            
            <title>The Unite for Diabetes campaign: Overcoming constraints to find a global policy solution</title>
			<description>Despite the fact that diabetes and other non-communicable diseases represent a significant proportion of the global burden of disease, proportionate global action has not occurred. A 2003 article reported on global constraints to the implementation of effective policies to curb non-communicable disease epidemics. These constraints include a lack of global advocacy, insufficient attention from funding agencies and governments, partnerships and interactions, capacity and resources, and global norms and standards, as well as orientation of health services to acute care. Building on these ideas, this paper will review the progress that has been made with regards to each constraint, focusing on the International Diabetes Federation's Unite for Diabetes campaign and United Nations resolution on diabetes to show how this event &#8211; driven by globalization &#8211; has helped remove some of these barriers. Additional progress in diabetes and NCD prevention and control is also highlighted. The paper concludes by outlining what still needs to happen for globalization to be an effective solution for diabetes and non-communicable disease prevention and control.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/3</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Karen Siegel and KM Venkat Narayan</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:3</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/2">
            
            <title>Tobacco industry issues management organizations: Creating a global corporate network to undermine public health</title>
			<description>Background:
The global tobacco epidemic claims 5 million lives each year, facilitated by the ability of transnational tobacco companies to delay or thwart meaningful tobacco control worldwide. A series of cross-company tobacco industry "issues management organizations" has played an important role in coordinating and implementing common strategies to defeat tobacco control efforts at international, national, and regional levels. This study examines the development and enumerates the activities of these organizations and explores the implications of continuing industry cooperation for global public health.
Methods:
Using a snowball sampling strategy, we collected documentary data from tobacco industry documents archives and assembled them into a chronologically organized case study.
Results:
The International Committee on Smoking Issues (ICOSI) was formed in 1977 by seven tobacco company chief executives to create common anti-tobacco control strategies and build a global network of regional and national manufacturing associations. The organization's name subsequently changed to INFOTAB. The multinational companies built the organization rapidly: by 1984, it had 69 members operating in 57 countries. INFOTAB material, including position papers and "action kits" helped members challenge local tobacco control measures and maintain tobacco-friendly environments. In 1992 INFOTAB was replaced by two smaller organizations. The Tobacco Documentation Centre, which continues to operate, distributes smoking-related information and industry argumentation to members, some produced by cross-company committees. Agro-Tobacco Services, and now Hallmark Marketing Services, assists the INFOTAB-backed and industry supported International Tobacco Growers Association in advancing claims regarding the economic importance of tobacco in developing nations.
Conclusion:
The massive scale and scope of this industry effort illustrate how corporate interests, when threatened by the globalization of public health, sidestep competitive concerns to coordinate their activities. The global network of national and regional manufacturing associations created and nurtured by INFOTAB remains active, particularly in relation to the recently negotiated global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Policymakers should be aware that although these associations claim to represent only national or regional interests, they are allied to and coordinated with a confederation of transnational tobacco companies seeking to protect profits by undermining public health.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/2</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Patricia A McDaniel, Gina Intinarelli and Ruth E Malone</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:2</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/1">
            
            <title>Can a bank crisis break your heart?</title>
			<description>Background:
To assess whether a banking system crisis increases short-term population cardiovascular mortality rates.
Methods:
International, longitudinal multivariate regression analysis of cardiovascular disease mortality data from 1960 to 2002
Results:
A system-wide banking crisis increases population heart disease mortality rates by 6.4% (95% CI: 2.5% to 10.2%, p &lt; 0.01) in high income countries, after controlling for economic change, macroeconomic instability, and population age and social distribution. The estimated effect is nearly four times as large in low income countries.
Conclusion:
Banking crises are a significant determinant of short-term increases in heart disease mortality rates, and may have more severe consequences for developing countries.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/4/1/1</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>David Stuckler, Christopher M Meissner and Lawrence P King</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2008, 4:1</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-4-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/12">
            
            <title>Canada's implementation of the Paragraph 6 Decision: is it sustainable public policy?</title>
			<description>Background:
Following the Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, Canada was among the first countries globally to amend its patent law, which resulted in Canada's Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR). CAMR allows the production and export of generic drugs to developing countries without the requisite manufacturing capacity to undertake a domestic compulsory license. CAMR has been the subject of much criticism lodged at its inability to ensure fast access to urgent medicines for least developing and developing countries in need. Only recently did the Canadian government grant Apotex the compulsory licenses required under CAMR to produce and export antiretroviral therapy to Rwanda's population.
Methods:
The objective of this research is to investigate whether the CAMR can feasibly achieve its humanitarian objectives given the political interests embedded in the crafting of the legislation. We used a political economy framework to analyze the effect of varied institutions, political processes, and economic interests on public policy outcomes. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nineteen key stakeholders from government, civil society and industry. Qualitative data analysis was performed using open-coding for themes, analyzing by stakeholder group.
Results:
CAMR is removed from the realities of developing countries and the pharmaceutical market. The legislation needs to include commercial incentives to galvanize the generic drug industry to make use of this legislation. CAMR assumes that developing country governments have the requisite knowledge and human resource capacity to make use of the regime, which is not the case. The legislation does not offer sufficient incentives for countries to turn to Canada when needed drugs may be procured cheaply from countries such as India. In the long term, developing and least developing countries seek sustainable solutions to meet the health needs of their population, including developing their own capacity and local industries.
Conclusion:
CAMR is symbolically meaningful but in practice, limited. The Rwanda case will be noteworthy in terms of the future of the legislation. To meet its intended international health objectives, this legislation needs to be better informed of developing country needs and global pharmaceutical market imperatives. Finally, we contend that serious public policy change cannot strike a balance between all vested interests. Above all, any feasible policy that aims to facilitate compulsory licensing must prioritize public health over trade or economic interests.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/12</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Jillian C Cohen-Kohler, Laura C Esmail and Andre Perez Cosio</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:12</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-12-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/11">
            
            <title>Transformational leadership, transnational culture and political competence in globalizing health care services: a case study of Jordan's King Hussein Cancer Center</title>
			<description>Background:
Following the demise of Jordan's King Hussein bin Talal to cancer in 1999, the country's Al-Amal Center was transformed from a poorly perceived and ineffectual cancer care institution into a Western-style comprehensive cancer center. Renamed King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), it achieved improved levels of quality, expanded cancer care services and achieved Joint Commission International accreditation under new leadership over a three-year period (2002&#8211;2005).
Methods:
An exploratory case research method was used to explain the rapid change to international standards. Sources including personal interviews, document review and on-site observations were combined to conduct a robust examination of KHCC's rapid changes.
Results:
The changes which occurred at the KHCC during its formation and leading up to its Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation can be understood within the conceptual frame of the transformational leadership model. Interviewees and other sources for the case study suggest the use of inspirational motivation, idealized influence, individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation, four factors in the transformational leadership model, had significant impact upon the attitudes and motivation of staff within KHCC. Changes in the institution were achieved through increased motivation and positive attitudes toward the use of JCI continuous improvement processes as well as increased professional training. The case study suggests the role of culture and political sensitivity needs re-definition and expansion within the transformational leadership model to adequately explain leadership in the context of globalizing health care services, specifically when governments are involved in the change initiative.
Conclusion:
The KHCC case underscores the utility of the transformational leadership model in an international health care context. To understand leadership in globalizing health care services, KHCC suggests culture is broader than organizational or societal culture to include an informal global network of medical professionals and Western technologies which facilitate global interaction. Additionally, political competencies among leaders may be particularly relevant in globalizing health care services where the goal is achieving international standards of care. Western communication technologies facilitate cross-border interaction, but social and political capital possessed by the leaders may be necessary for transactions across national borders to occur thus gaining access to specialized information and global thought leaders in a medical sub-specialty such as oncology.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/11</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Jeffrey L Moe, Gregory Pappas and Andrew Murray</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:11</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-16</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/10">
            
            <title>Health, human rights, and the conduct of clinical research within oppressed populations</title>
			<description>Background:
Clinical trials evaluating interventions for infectious diseases require enrolling participants that are vulnerable to infection. As clinical trials are conducted in increasingly vulnerable populations, issues of protection of these populations become challenging. In settings where populations are forseeably oppressed, the conduct of research requires considerations that go beyond common ethical concerns and into issues of international human rights law.DiscussionUsing examples of HIV prevention trials in Thailand, hepatitis-E prevention trials in Nepal and malaria therapeutic trials in Burma (Myanmar), we address the inadequacies of current ethical guidelines when conducting research within oppressed populations. We review existing legislature in the United States and United Kingdom that may be used against foreign investigators if trial hardships exist. We conclude by making considerations for research conducted within oppressed populations.</description>
			<link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/10</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Edward J Mills and Sonal Singh</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:10</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-08</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-08</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
